We performed a comparison between Delphix and Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Data Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect is the product is easy to manage, with a good dashboard. We can easily configure it on the front end and back end."
"Delphix's technical support is fairly knowledgeable."
"Data being available anytime is a life changer."
"It is a stable solution."
"It's really easy to install."
"Delphix interfaces are simple to use and very user friendly."
"It provides the ability to roll back to a point in time or roll forward without the assistance of a DBA."
"Delphix can do data masking in any format. Not many solutions can do that."
"It's most compatible with VMware. It can restore single files instead of having to restore the whole machine, once again leading to savings for the company."
"I like the incremental backups and their failover."
"The Veeam Backup and Replication Suite is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration with Veeam Backup & Replication console."
"The ease of use for the graphical interface and the ease of installation are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The solution is very user-friendly and has an easy to use interface. We can manage it easily. It allows for a simple backup."
"It's simple to use."
"Veeam Agent for Linux's most valuable feature is the compatibility with virtual machines, such as VMware."
"My only complaint about this solution is the price."
"GUI could be improved."
"Delphix is quite expensive."
"Delphix could be improved with better usability and an agentless option."
"When it comes to unstructured and structured data, if Delphix can comply with the requirements for most of the structured data, it would be good, especially if it can include the data scanning part."
"Delphix needs better partnerships from a customer perspective. It's how they sell it, not what they're selling."
"As a commercial model, it's very good. However, maybe it would be nice for Delphix to integrate with some other platforms."
"This product should be extended and made to be a more comprehensive storage solution."
"In new releases, I hope they can support Oracle cloud."
"In terms of the physical environment, I'd like them to integrate it with other kinds of solutions. We don't just work with Microsoft or Linux, but other kinds of infrastructure data as well."
"The pricing could be lowered if possible."
"There is a compatibility issue with HCI."
"More Linux systems should be made compatible with the solution."
"The solution is pretty stable right now, however, we believe that the solution could be made to be even more stable."
"The integration needs improvement."
"We are currently waiting for the continuous backup process."
Delphix is ranked 1st in Test Data Management with 15 reviews while Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Test Data Management with 23 reviews. Delphix is rated 8.0, while Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Delphix writes "Handles large volumes of data with ease, but the self-service portal must be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] writes "Reliable and issue-free with a helpful onboarding wizard". Delphix is most compared with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Denodo, Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) and Actifio, whereas Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Microsoft DPM, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Rubrik and MSP360 Backup. See our Delphix vs. Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] report.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.