We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Cortez XSOAR and Splunk Phantom based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions come across as reliable and powerful products. Cortex does slightly better in the Pricing category, however.
"The UI of Sentinel is very good and easy to use, even for beginners."
"Sentinel pricing is good"
"The most valuable feature is the alert notifications, which are categorized by severity levels: informational, low, medium, and high."
"There are some very powerful features to Sentinel, such as the integration of various connectors. We have a lot of departments that use both IaaS and SaaS services, including M365 as well as Azure services. The ability to leverage connectors into these environments allows for large-scale data injection."
"The main benefit is the ease of integration."
"Its inbuilt Kusto Query Language is a valuable feature. It provides the flexibility needed to leverage advanced data analytics rules and policies and enables us to easily navigate all our security events in a single view. It helps any user easily understand the data or any security lags in their data and applications."
"I've worked on most of the top SIEM solutions, and Sentinel has an edge in most areas. For example, it has built-in SOAR capabilities, allowing you to run playbooks automatically. Other vendors typically offer SOAR as a separate licensed solution or module, but you get it free with Sentinel. In-depth incident integration is available out of the box."
"Sentinel is a Microsoft product, so they provide very robust use cases and analytic groups, which are very beneficial for the security team. I also like the ability to integrate data sources into the software for on-premise and cloud-based solutions."
"Its agility and scalability are valuable."
"I have found the solution very useful, it integrates well with other platforms."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"The drag-and-drop interface enables analysts with no programming knowledge to create playbooks easily."
"The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."
"The automation is excellent."
"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."
"It’s easy to install."
"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."
"The ability to automate Splunk SOAR and customize the playbook use cases is the most valuable feature and is very exciting for me."
"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."
"I'm just a beginner on the solution and it's pretty easy for me to use."
"Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task."
"Technical support is helpful."
"My understanding is the initial setup isn't too hard."
"The customization continues to be excellent."
"The solution could be more user-friendly; some query languages are required to operate it."
"They can work on the EDR side of things... Every time we need to onboard these kinds of machines into the EDR, we need to do it with the help of Intune, to sync up the devices, and do the configuration. I'm looking for something on the EDR side that will reduce this kind of work."
"The learning curve could be improved. I am still learning it. We were able to implement the basic features to get them up and running, but there are still so many things that I don't know about all its features. They have a lot of features that we have not been able to use or apply. If they could work on reducing the solution's learning curve, that would be good. While there is a training course held by Microsoft to learn more about this solution, there is a cost associated with it."
"Given that I am in the small business space, I wish they would make it easier to operate Sentinel without being a Sentinel expert. Examples of things that could be easier are creating alerts and automations from scratch and designing workbooks."
"They're giving us the queries so we can plug them right into Sentinel. They need to have a streamlined process for updating them in the tool and knowing when things are updated and knowing when there are new detections available from Microsoft."
"There is room for improvement in entity behavior and the integration site."
"Sometimes, we are observing large ingestion delays. We expect logs within 5 minutes, but it takes about 10 to 15 minutes."
"I would like to see more AI used in processes."
"It's only one cloud right now. It might be helpful for some companies to have an on-premies option."
"The tool’s multi-tenancy feature must be improved."
"There is room for improvement in support. The response time could be faster."
"There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot."
"The dashboard performance could be improved."
"It would be ideal if we could automate processes even more."
"The algorithm and machine learning have room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
"The number of playbooks on offer should be increased."
"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region."
"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."
"Some of the training materials are on a basic level."
"The scalability could be better."
"Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch.."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Swimlane, IBM Resilient and ServiceNow Security Operations, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq, Tines and Fortinet FortiSOAR. See our Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR report.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
I would recommend CyberSponse. There is a reason why CyberSponse have been awarded Government and Military contracts over all the competition! Commerical customers need the same power and capability, why settle for anything less!