We performed a comparison between Denodo and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Denodo is lightweight in terms of how it leads you to combine your discrete data systems at one spot."
"Access to numerous forums and internet information."
"This solution provides us with the ability to sync data, and make it available for anyone to use across the business."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"It allows a lot of traceability and you can decide what data you want to collect"
"It is a very stable solution."
"Data mining is one of the valuable features. We're able to connect all of the data sources with the installed driver, so that is a good advantage in Denodo. Being able to join the tables and view them is also valuable."
"It is a go-to tool for data virtualization. The virtualization and data catalog are the features of why we chose Denodo."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"We can't scale it to meet digital requirements."
"The solution is slow when there are many virtualization layers."
"The data catalog certainly has room for improvement. It is functional but we look forward to development. We are in constant contact with Denodo and they are fully aware of our needs."
"I would like it if we could pull the data model or export the data model because Denodo has, based on how you build, something called associations. The data model gets very confusing when you go look at it. It depends on how you define it, but it's really huge. I wish there was a way to export it into Visio. It could be that they already have a way to do it, and I don't know, but it would be much easier for the architects and even for the developers to look at it than scrunching it into the screen and expanding every small portion of it. If there was an easy way to export the Denodo model into another modeling tool and view it, it would be great."
"The solution should have its own acceleration technology."
"Performance management could be improved."
"There are a couple of areas that can be improved in Denodo. From a stability point of view, sometimes we see issues in the data management functionality. This only happens now and then, however, and usually takes place when we add in our own customization."
"We would like this solution to be more universally user-friendly. At present it is really only aimed at IT specialists."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"The price could be improved."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
Denodo is ranked 8th in Cloud Data Integration with 29 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Informatica PowerCenter and Palantir Foundry, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and AWS Glue. See our Denodo vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
