We performed a comparison between Denodo and Palantir Gotham based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Denodo is lightweight in terms of how it leads you to combine your discrete data systems at one spot."
"The most valuable feature is Data Catalogs."
"It is a go-to tool for data virtualization. The virtualization and data catalog are the features of why we chose Denodo."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the short time frame in which you can deliver and connect."
"The most valuable features are query optimization and the single language independence from the sources we're using to catch data."
"The data abstraction is the most valuable feature."
"Data mining is one of the valuable features. We're able to connect all of the data sources with the installed driver, so that is a good advantage in Denodo. Being able to join the tables and view them is also valuable."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"I would like it if we could pull the data model or export the data model because Denodo has, based on how you build, something called associations. The data model gets very confusing when you go look at it. It depends on how you define it, but it's really huge. I wish there was a way to export it into Visio. It could be that they already have a way to do it, and I don't know, but it would be much easier for the architects and even for the developers to look at it than scrunching it into the screen and expanding every small portion of it. If there was an easy way to export the Denodo model into another modeling tool and view it, it would be great."
"The dropdown menus feel antiquated to me, and the administrative portals need improvement."
"There are a couple of areas that can be improved in Denodo. From a stability point of view, sometimes we see issues in the data management functionality. This only happens now and then, however, and usually takes place when we add in our own customization."
"Performance management could be improved."
"The solution is slow when there are many virtualization layers."
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"The solution should have its own acceleration technology."
"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."
Earn 20 points
Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews while Palantir Gotham is ranked 33rd in Data Integration with 1 review. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Palantir Gotham is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palantir Gotham writes "A seamless all-in-one solution ". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Palantir Gotham is most compared with Palantir Foundry, Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler, Azure Data Factory and SAS Data Management.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.