We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"The integrated application protection provided by Alteon is very good. It really helps to avoid false positives in some cases. It provides important granularity to avoid a situation in which security or cybersecurity scenarios escape us."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"It saves us a lot of work in terms of management since it has tasks already defined automatically. That enables us to better administer our services. It is very dynamic and easy to administer."
"The health status information, with its highly detailed reporting, has saved us time on troubleshooting. We have the precise information needed that helps us find different types of situations."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
"The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
"We don't integrate anything with it because most things don't integrate with Radware. If it were F5, we could integrate it. We can integrate F5 with practically anything that integrates with a load balancer, but that's not the case with Alteon."
"The service could be improved by better customer support."
"The solution could be more open to additional third-party add-ons being integrated into it."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
"Scalability should be based on customer requirements."
"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly."
"We’d like the solution to include more security features in the standard license."
"Radware Alteon could improve the troubleshooting from the command line interface, they could do a better job making it easier."
R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Radware Alteon is ranked 10th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 33 reviews. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.