• Home
  • R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) vs. SiteLock

R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) vs SiteLock comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rohde & Schwarz Logo

R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)

Read 1 R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) review
537 views|250 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SiteLock Logo

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews
432 views|340 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and SiteLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
SeydouSidibe
Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available
By publishing the application without fear, my customer has created new revenue by making the website available anytime and anywhere. We noticed a... Read more →
Anonymous User
Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security...
I run several personal websites and after getting hacked on one of them I found SiteLock. Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

    • More SiteLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Questions from the Community
    Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
    Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ranking
    31st
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    537
    Comparisons
    250
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    30th
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    432
    Comparisons
    340
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
    Learn More
    Rohde & Schwarz
    SiteLock
    Overview

    Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

    Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

    Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while SiteLock is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while SiteLock is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas SiteLock is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare, AWS WAF and Imperva DDoS.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.