We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.