R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) vs WAPPLES comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and WAPPLES based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
545
Comparisons
255
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
135
Comparisons
110
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
Overview

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

WAPPLES is a virtual web application firewall designed for the cloud consumer. WAPPLES runs on an intelligent logic analysis engine called Contents Classification and Evaluation Processing, or COCEP. This logic analysis engine utilizes a system of 26 'rules' to execute a logical analysis of all types of web traffic to determine whether or not certain traffic constitutes a threat to the web application. If traffic can successfully pass through all 26 rules, WAPPLES determines that the traffic is not an attack, and transports legitimate traffic to the web application. The split-second performance of the COCEP enables WAPPLES to determine if traffic is safe in just 1/1000 of a second.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while WAPPLES is ranked 41st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while WAPPLES is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas WAPPLES is most compared with AWS WAF and Symantec Web Application Firewall.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.