Compare Dexon BPM vs. Whitestein Technologies Living Systems Process Suite

Dexon BPM is ranked 70th in Business Process Management while Whitestein Technologies Living Systems Process Suite is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management. Dexon BPM is rated 0, while Whitestein Technologies Living Systems Process Suite is rated 0. On the other hand, Dexon BPM is most compared with , whereas Whitestein Technologies Living Systems Process Suite is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Dexon BPM? Share your opinion.
Use Whitestein Technologies Living Systems Process Suite? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Living Systems Process Suite
Learn
camunda
Dexon Software
Whitestein Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation

With DEXON BPM, our clients can define and implement in a single application, the flow of their processes, the business data used, the information systems, the people and the organizational structure for the optimization and automation of business processes

The Living Systems Process Suite (LSPS) platform is designed to answer the needs of business and IT in one package. It is a great choice if you choose to build a simple standalone application to automate a paper-based workflow, integrate aging legacy infrastructure, or create intelligent software solutions that adapt their behavior to business events in order to achieve business outcomes.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Dexon BPM
Learn more about Whitestein Technologies Living Systems Process Suite
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentColumbian Nation Police, AUNAP, Grupo MartiRF Logistics, Expersoft Systems, Kenco
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Non Profit25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Construction Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company7%
Government6%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise35%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.