We performed a comparison between DFLabs IncMan SOAR and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)."The solution has features that helped improve the security posture of our clients. It provides the ability to correlate a large variety of log sources very cost-effectively, especially for Microsoft sources."
"The log analysis is excellent; it can predict what can or will happen regarding use patterns and vulnerabilities."
"Free ingestion for Azure logs (with E5 licence)"
"It is easy to implement (turn on) - does need a skilled analyst to develop queries and playbooks."
"The features that stand out are the detection engine and its integration with multiple data sources."
"What is most useful, is that it has a good connection to the Microsoft ecosystem, and I think that's the key part."
"The part that was very unexpected was Sentinel's ability to integrate with Azure Lighthouse, which, as a managed services solution provider, gives us the ability to also manage our customers' Sentinel environments or Sentinel workspaces. It is a big plus for us. With its integration with Lighthouse, we get the ability to monitor multiple workspaces from one portal. A lot of the Microsoft Sentinel workbooks already integrate with that capability, and we save countless amounts of money by simply being able to almost immediately realize multitenant capabilities. That alone is a big plus for us."
"Microsoft Sentinel provides the capability to integrate different log sources. On top of having several data connectors in place, you can also do integration with a threat intelligence platform to enhance and enrich the data that's available. You can collect as many logs and build all the use cases."
"The vendors themselves will actually help with any customizations a client may require"
"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"Its flexibility is the most valuable."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"IBM Resilient is scalable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup of IBM Resilient is not that complex since my company already has a support license that we use internally. In general, the product's deployment phase is not that complex."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"We do have in-built or out-of-the-box metrics that are shown on the dashboard, but it doesn't give the kind of metrics that we need from our environment whereby we need to check the meantime to detect and meantime to resolve an incident. I have to do it manually. I have to pull all the logs or all the alerts that are fed into Sentinel over a certain period. We do this on a monthly basis, so I go into Microsoft Sentinel and pull all the alerts or incidents we closed over a period of thirty days."
"Its implementation could be simpler. It is not really simple or straightforward. It is in the middle. Sometimes, connectors are a little bit complex."
"The performance could be improved. If I create 15 to 20 lines for a single-use case in KQL, sometimes it takes more time to execute. If I create use cases within a certain timeline, the result will show in .01 seconds. A complex query takes more time to get results."
"They're giving us the queries so we can plug them right into Sentinel. They need to have a streamlined process for updating them in the tool and knowing when things are updated and knowing when there are new detections available from Microsoft."
"Sentinel's reporting is complex and can be more user-friendly."
"Azure Sentinel will be directly competing with tools such as Splunk or Qradar. These are very established kinds of a product that have been around for the last seven, eight years or more."
"It could have a better API to be able to automate many things more extensively and get more extensive data and more expensive deployment possibilities. It can gain some points on the automation part and the integration part. The API is very limited, and I would like to see it extended a bit more."
"Its documentation is not so simple. It is easy for somebody who is Microsoft certified or more closely attached to Microsoft solutions. It is not easy for those who are working on open-source platforms. There isn't a central point where everything is documented, and there is no specific training or certification."
"The support is not 24/7."
"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The product needs a bit more development."
"Its price needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
DFLabs IncMan SOAR is ranked 28th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 17 reviews. DFLabs IncMan SOAR is rated 0.0, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DFLabs IncMan SOAR writes "Protects an organization from the threat of a data breach or cyberattack". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility ". DFLabs IncMan SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Siemplify.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.