• Home
  • Diamanti vs. VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL]

Diamanti vs VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Diamanti Logo

Diamanti

427 views|331 comparisons
VMware Logo

VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL]

Read 13 VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Diamanti and VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Diamanti?
Anonymous User
We like having four built-in nodes. We lost one, but our load kept going. In future releases, I want to be able to...
The benefits of EVO:RAIL is the simple configuration, the scalability, so as we add VDI users. We are just planning to add more EVO:RAIL... Read more →
Comparison Review
Anonymous User
Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod
Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans. The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ). First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors. Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in… Read more →
Ranking
21st
out of 26 in Container Management
Views
427
Comparisons
331
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Container Management
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
EVO:RAIL
Learn More
Diamanti
VMware
Video Not Available
Overview
Diamanti appliance is purpose-built for containerized applications that combines the ease of hyperconverged infrastructure with the unparalleled performance and efficiency of bare-metal containers. Diamanti addresses the unique requirements of containerized applications, ensuring network interoperability and persistent storage. Diamanti virtualizes network and storage for containers using a built-in PCIe converged I/O controller in every appliance to guarantee application performance without code changes or customization. The PCIe architecture delivers order-of-magnitude latency improvement compared with traditional shared-storage systems and software overlays.
VMware EVO:RAIL combines VMware compute, networking, and storage resources into a hyper-converged infrastructure appliance to create a simple, easy to deploy, all-in-one solution offered by Qualified EVO:RAIL Partners.
Sample Customers
Kubernetes, Mesosphere, NBC Universal, Red Hat
ASAHI INTERACTIVE, Fukuoka-Hibiki Shinkin Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company9%
Educational Organization7%
REVIEWERS
Agriculture14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Retailer14%
Media Company14%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise77%
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise47%
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Diamanti is ranked 21st in Container Management while VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Container Management. Diamanti is rated 0.0, while VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] writes "We like having four built-in nodes. We lost one, but our load kept going. In future releases, I want to be able to bring up appliances and different data centers with smooth replication". Diamanti is most compared with Rancher Labs, Kubernetes, Portworx Enterprise, OpenShift Container Platform and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.