Compare Digital.ai TeamForge vs. PractiTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai TeamForge Logo
467 views|386 comparisons
PractiTest Logo
1,119 views|812 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Digital.ai TeamForge? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
467
Comparisons
386
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,119
Comparisons
812
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
739
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
CollabNet TeamForge
Learn
Digital.ai
PractiTest
Overview

Gain visibility into software development with a versatile and secure management platform for traditional and bi-modal development. With Digital.ai TeamForge, software teams have the flexibility to choose the best possible workflows without risking overall process compliance. 

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


Offer
Learn more about Digital.ai TeamForge
Learn more about PractiTest
Sample Customers
Philips Medical Systems, Life Technologies, Barclays Global Investors (BGI), ADVA Optical Networking, Sun Microsystems, SingleMind Consulting, IntelCanonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Digital.ai TeamForge is ranked 22nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while PractiTest is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review. Digital.ai TeamForge is rated 0.0, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". Digital.ai TeamForge is most compared with Jira, Atlassian ALM, TFS, Digital.ai Agility and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Zephyr Enterprise and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.