Anonymous UserAsst. Vice president, Applications Architecture at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The pricing is reasonable at this time."
"TFS is more competitively priced than some other solutions."
"We pay subscription fees on a yearly basis and the price is reasonable."
"I wouldn't say that this tool is cheap or expensive but in the middle."
"We are using the open-source version."
Gain visibility into software development with a versatile and secure management platform for traditional and bi-modal development. With Digital.ai TeamForge, software teams have the flexibility to choose the best possible workflows without risking overall process compliance.
Digital.ai TeamForge is ranked 22nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 4th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 14 reviews. Digital.ai TeamForge is rated 0.0, while TFS is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Good project management features improve discipline and productivity in our application development lifecycle". Digital.ai TeamForge is most compared with Jira, Atlassian ALM and Digital.ai Agility, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and TestRail by Gurock.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.