Ranking | |
Views 3,906 Comparisons 3,339 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 11 Comparisons 3 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 42% of the time. ![]() Compared 19% of the time. ![]() Compared 10% of the time. ![]() Compared 6% of the time. ![]() Compared 4% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
Asterisk | TrueUC |
Learn | |
Digium | MetTel |
Overview | |
Open source PBX system providing a complete telecommunications platform. | With MetTel’s TrueUC app, working remotely can be as seamless as working in an office. With 50% of employees working out of the office and offices spread across the country, having a consistent communications experience is imperative to enable your employees to collaborate and work more efficiently. TrueUC is the first of its kind complete solution as it’s bundled with mobile service, unified communication, and mobile device management all delivered from a single provider – MetTel. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Digium Asterisk | Learn more about MetTel TrueUC |
Sample Customers | |
Yahoo, Penn Univeristy of Pennsylvania, US Army, Google, eBay | Le Duff, Rotech Healthcare, City of Pheonix, FIS, Basic Energy |
Top Industries | |
Comms Service Provider33% Computer Software Company22% Government7% Retailer6% | No Data Available |
Digium Asterisk is ranked 4th in Unified Communications while MetTel TrueUC is ranked 26th in Unified Communications. Digium Asterisk is rated 0.0, while MetTel TrueUC is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Digium Asterisk is most compared with Kamailio SIP Server, 3CX, Cisco Jabber, Cisco Unified Communications and Fortinet FortiVoice, whereas MetTel TrueUC is most compared with .
See our list of best Unified Communications vendors.
We monitor all Unified Communications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.