Compare Dimensions CM vs. IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Dimensions CM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Compuware, Broadcom and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.""It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
177
Comparisons
87
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
3,789
Comparisons
2,706
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
519
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 65% of the time.
Also Known As
Serena Dimensions CMIBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Learn
Micro Focus
IBM
Overview

Manage application changes across platforms, locations, and teams. Dimensions CM (formerly Serena Dimensions CM) streamlines the complexity of collaborative parallel development to increase team velocity and ensure release readiness.

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

Offer
Learn more about Dimensions CM
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Sample Customers
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH), Generali France, Raiffeisen Software, Space and Naval Warfare Information Technology Center (SPAWAR ITC), SPTS Technologies, TeamstreetTelstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Government8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Compuware, Broadcom and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dimensions CM is ranked 13th in Software Configuration Management while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 1st in Software Configuration Management with 2 reviews. Dimensions CM is rated 0.0, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards". Dimensions CM is most compared with SCCM and Serena ChangeMan ZMF, whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, CA Endevor Software Change Manager, Rally Software and TFS.

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.