IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] vs OpenText Dimensions RM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] and OpenText Dimensions RM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Requirements Management
Views
304
Comparisons
215
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational RequisitePro
Micro Focus Dimensions RM, Serena Dimensions RM
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview
IBM Rational RequisitePro, a requirements management tool that teams can use to manage project requirements comprehensively in order to promote communication and collaboration among team members and reduce project risk. Requirements management is essential for improving your software development process. Rational RequisitePro uses a project database for managing requirements in views with sort and query capabilities. It also includes integration with Microsoft Word for creating and maintaining requirements documents that are linked to the database for real-time updates to requirements from within documents. The database and Word integration helps you organize and prioritize your requirements, trace relationships between them, and track changes that affect them. Traceability features visually indicate how changes affect the project, thereby helping to perform impact analysis and make informed decisions for scope management or resource allocation. Rational RequisitePro captures the change history for each requirement, thereby providing a paper audit of the evolution of project requirements.

Dimensions RMĀ is a full-featured and proven web-based requirements management solution that improves the definition, management and reuse of requirements, increases visibility and collaboration across all stakeholders, and provides real end-to-end traceability from initial ideas to deliverables.

Sample Customers
Balfour Beatty, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP), MdPnP.org
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Transportation Company11%
Marketing Services Firm8%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise76%
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Requirements Management while OpenText Dimensions RM is ranked 12th in Application Requirements Management. IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] is rated 8.0, while OpenText Dimensions RM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] writes "Provides traceability for internal applications". On the other hand, IBM Rational RequisitePro [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Dimensions RM is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.