Imperva Bot Management vs Oracle Dyn Web Application Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imperva Bot Management and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, F5, Radware and others in Bot Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Bot Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of the product is good since I haven't had any problems with the solution.""I am impressed with the product's automatic bot mechanism. It also gives us the control to create our own custom bot rules."

More Imperva Bot Management Pros →

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

More Oracle Dyn Web Application Security Pros →

Cons
"Sometimes, it takes a bit of time for the technical staff of the solution to get back to our company with a resolution for our problems.""The tool needs to include artificial intelligence and machine learning. It also needs to improve profiling."

More Imperva Bot Management Cons →

"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."

More Oracle Dyn Web Application Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The tool's pricing is good."
  • "I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
  • More Imperva Bot Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Bot Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The stability of the product is good since I haven't had any problems with the solution.
    Top Answer:I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. The price of the product also depends on the cost of the tools offered by competitors like… more »
    Top Answer:At the moment, I am okay with the product. I haven't found something that needs to be improved yet. I am not physically busy with any implementations associated with the product, but I will share the… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 17 in Bot Management
    Views
    353
    Comparisons
    347
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    108
    Comparisons
    89
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Distil Networks, Distil Bot Detection and Mitigation
    Dyn Web Application Security, Zenedge
    Learn More
    Overview
    Distil Networks is the first easy and accurate way to identify and police malicious website traffic, blocking 99.9% of bad bots without impacting legitimate users. Only 41% of web traffic originates from humans, so it’s imperative to be able to detect and block automated attacks. Bots are the key culprits behind web scraping, online fraud, web application security breaches, content spam, digital ad fraud, and downtime. Distil Networks is purpose built to defeat bad bots that circumvent traditional web application defenses like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs). Distil makes your web applications more secure with API security, real-time threat intelligence, a 24/7 security operations center, and complete visibility and control over human, good bot, and bad bot traffic.

    ZENEDGE offers total security for your Web applications and networks, identifying threat actors, and stopping malicious bot traffic and DDoS attacks from reaching your servers. Malicious traffic is intercepted at the edge of the network by the ZENEDGE cybersecurity platform, stopping it from ever reaching your web application or network, ensuring continued uptime and normal operations. Ongoing monitoring, threat intel and regular security updates protect against new zero-day vulnerabilities.

    Sample Customers
    StubHub, Yelp, Glassdoor, DowJones, The Wall Street Journal, Whitepages, CrunchBase, AOL, Staples, Wayfair, EasyJet, Autotrader, Skyscanner, Orbitz, and Conde Nast, Amadeus, and Thomson Reuters, just to name a few.
    FoodStorm, Soccer Shots
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government6%
    Retailer5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise57%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Bot Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, F5, Radware and others in Bot Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imperva Bot Management is ranked 4th in Bot Management with 2 reviews while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 48th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva Bot Management is rated 8.0, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Imperva Bot Management writes "A product that offers advanced bot detection capabilities and reporting features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". Imperva Bot Management is most compared with Cequence Security, Akamai Bot Manager, AWS WAF, Cloudflare and DataDome Real-Time Bot Protection, whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .

    We monitor all Bot Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.