Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rapid7 Logo
117 views|81 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
4,709 views|4,269 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightCloudSec and Red Hat CloudForms based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's most valuable feature is workload protection for Kubernetes and container security. It has agents that identify bugs or lack of security on runtime containers.""The tool provides centralized visibility through dashboards and alerts, allowing customers to receive reports on cloud vulnerabilities and security posture. Rapid7 InsightCloudSec provides customers with a robust understanding of cloud security.""Agentless scanning is a possible use with Rapid7 InsightCloudSec.""I find the security frameworks and security tools valuable. I think they're good in the infrastructure of the code security. They are also good at threat protection."

More Rapid7 InsightCloudSec Pros →

"The solution is compatible and integrates with various infrastructures or providers.""The optimization of the solution is quite interesting.""The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't had any issues with it.""They are a very mature product.""I am impressed with the product's reports.""The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality.""Red Hat CloudForms is stable once it is up and running.""Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

More Red Hat CloudForms Pros →

Cons
"The tool needs to improve its documentation.""Technical support could be better. It could also be easier, more user-friendly, and intuitive. The API keys aren't easy to understand, and the cloud layouts aren't intuitive and user-friendly. We should be able to integrate IM governance and APIs into non-compliant workloads like legacy solutions.""Rapid7 InsightCloudSec could be better at showing dashboards for virtual firewalls and appliances. Compared to other solutions like Palo Alto, this area is not as good. So, they should work on improving this for virtual devices.""There are a lot of other solutions in the market, not only providing the features of a CSPM, but also CNAPP."

More Rapid7 InsightCloudSec Cons →

"The complexity of the solution is a bit high in comparison to VMware.""Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high.""All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating.""The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved.""Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them.""The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet.""The solution is still quite immature.""It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs."

More Red Hat CloudForms Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We're doing an annual subscription. There are additional expenses, but not within the confines of this platform."
  • "Companies generally buy this tool because the pricing is not that high."
  • More Rapid7 InsightCloudSec Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."
  • "The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."
  • "Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."
  • "The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."
  • "Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."
  • More Red Hat CloudForms Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool provides centralized visibility through dashboards and alerts, allowing customers to receive reports on cloud vulnerabilities and security posture. Rapid7 InsightCloudSec provides customers… more »
    Top Answer:Companies generally buy this tool because the pricing is not that high. ICS's pricing is still per the market standard, but there are a lot of other solutions that are more expensive than Rapid7 ICs… more »
    Top Answer:Rapid7 InsightCloudSec could be better at showing dashboards for virtual firewalls and appliances. Compared to other solutions like Palo Alto, this area is not as good. So, they should work on… more »
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the product's reports.
    Top Answer:I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions.
    Top Answer:I would rate the product a four out of ten since its implementation is not as good as it sounds.
    Ranking
    31st
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    117
    Comparisons
    81
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    568
    Rating
    7.3
    7th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    4,709
    Comparisons
    4,269
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    392
    Rating
    6.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DivvyCloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Detect cloud risk immediately with real-time, agentless visibility into everything running across your entire environment. Know exactly which risk signals to prioritize thanks to complete context, with the broadest and deepest coverage across major cloud platforms. Enforce organizational standards, streamline the remediation process, and fix compliance drift immediately with native, no-code automation.

    Manage container, virtual, private, and public cloud infrastructures

    Managing a complex, hybrid IT environment can require multiple management tools, redundant policy implementations, and extra staff to handle the operations. Red Hat® CloudForms simplifies IT, providing unified management and operations in a hybrid environment.

    As your IT infrastructure progresses from traditional virtualization toward an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model, CloudForms evolves, protecting your investments and providing consistent user experience and functionality.

    Sample Customers
    Fannie Mae, 3M, PizzaHut, Spotify, Autodesk, Discovery
    Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Media Company12%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs. Red Hat CloudForms
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Rapid7 InsightCloudSec is ranked 31st in Cloud Management with 3 reviews while Red Hat CloudForms is ranked 7th in Cloud Management with 10 reviews. Rapid7 InsightCloudSec is rated 7.6, while Red Hat CloudForms is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightCloudSec writes "Agentless scanning helps monitor workloads, but the solution needs a better UI and should include CNAPP features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat CloudForms writes "Easily integrates with various out-of-the-box or third-party vendors". Rapid7 InsightCloudSec is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Wiz, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub, whereas Red Hat CloudForms is most compared with Morpheus, VMware Aria Automation, vCloud Director, OpenNebula and IBM Cloud Automation Manager. See our Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.