We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Mirantis Container Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"Mirantis Container Cloud operates similarly to how we interact with databases. It provides a comprehensive platform for deploying and managing containerized applications across cloud environments."
"The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward."
"One of the most valuable feature is its scalability because it is easy to work with. Even though I haven't fully removed it before, it's simple to get started and develop further. It's comparable to working with languages like C++ and Python. Python. It is easy to understand and more user-friendly."
"Main products are portable."
"It is a compact, complete solution that performs well."
"The product's most valuable feature is cloud simulation to predict application behavior on the cloud."
"It is a stable solution. It is nearly perfect. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"I think the volume binding is a really interesting feature."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"Integration with Windows is something that can be improved."
"There could be an automation feature included in the product. It will speed up application processes and will not require scripting codes."
"When it comes to the integration part, it's the basic functionality, but for any product, at the end of the day, security is extremely relevant. I personally feel like you have to constantly strive towards being more secure. You can never be 100% secure, and you have to work more toward security. It's as simple as that."
"It will be better if the product provides dynamic load-balancing capabilities."
"An improvement would be automated testing."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"I think this solution needs better security due to more risks from the outside world."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 37th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 1st in Container Virtualization with 28 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher and Snyk. See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Mirantis Container Cloud report.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
