Compare Docker vs. Tripwire IP360

Docker is ranked 4th in Container Security with 9 reviews while Tripwire IP360 is ranked 9th in Container Security with 2 reviews. Docker is rated 9.0, while Tripwire IP360 is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Enables us to run a different operating system and browser combination on a single machine of 16 GB Redhat 7". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tripwire IP360 writes "A mature and evolving solution that has become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network". Docker is most compared with Canonical LXD, CoreOS Rocket and Flockport, whereas Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner. See our Docker vs. Tripwire IP360 report.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Docker Logo
3,198 views|2,412 comparisons
Tripwire IP360 Logo
1,367 views|670 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Tripwire IP360 and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

You need to make an architectural runway before actually starting to implement Docker Compose, especially in a distributed environment.The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward.It is a compact, complete solution that performs well.This solution has improved our organization with the agility, microservices approach, and scalable solutions for distributed systems.Docker is very helpful for taking the code from development and applying it to the end user.Now it is easier to set up the development environment and also to test the applications on the pipelines.The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand.

Read more »

It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed.

Read more »

I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand.I would also like to see more features inside Docker as well as more integration with different solutions.The initial setup was quite complex.The orchestration and tracing should be improved.It would be very nice to have a GUI that can be used by any administrator, and not just people who have experience with Docker.The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs.I think this solution needs better security due to more risks from the outside world.Sometimes the basic support is a bit difficult if you have a firewall and cloud servers behind the firewall and then try to implement the backup solution, it is a bit difficult to do by yourself.

Read more »

The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We use the free version of this solution.The community edition does not require a license and is completely free.The pricing and licensing really depends on what your needs are. You could be paying $100 a month to $100,000. It depends on the needs you have from the solution, and the agreement you make.It is more costly than other products, but it is worth every penny.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
out of 20 in Container Security
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
out of 20 in Container Security
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Top Comparisons
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 55% of the time.
Also Known As
Video Not Available

Docker provides an integrated technology suite that enables development and IT operations teams to build, ship, and run distributed applications anywhere. Docker allows you to package an application with all of its dependencies into a standardized unit for software development. Docker containers wrap up a piece of software in a complete filesystem that contains everything it needs to run: code, runtime, system tools, system libraries, anything you can install on a server. This guarantees that it will always run the same, regardless of the environment it is running in.

Tripwire IP360 delivers risk-based vulnerability assessment and asset discovery capabilities. With IP360, you get:

  • Comprehensive discovery and profiling of all network assets.
  • Highly scalable architecture with low network impact.
  • Advanced vulnerability scoring that identifies top risks.
  • Prioritized change results when used with Tripwire Enterprise.
Learn more about Docker
Learn more about Tripwire IP360
Sample Customers
illumina, Groupon, PayPal, ebay, ING, New RelicState of Iowa, State of Minnesota, U.S. Cellular
Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Tripwire IP360 and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email