DocStar ECM vs Objective ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Epicor Logo
168 views|92 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Objective Logo
561 views|515 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DocStar ECM and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
168
Comparisons
92
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
561
Comparisons
515
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
docSTAR eclipse
Learn More
Overview
Helping businesses translate vision into action for more than 20 years, DocStar offers delivers a flexible and innovative enterprise content management and process automation platform. Easy to implement and use—both in the cloud and on premises—DocStar proven technology and global process expertise empowers organizations to operate at peak performance, navigate change, and grow. By scaling and modernizing operations and enabling greater collaboration, DocStar allows data and transactions to flow efficiently throughout your organization. With increased visibility among employees, customers, and partners, we deliver better business outcomes such as increased auditability and greater ease of compliance.

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Sample Customers
Gillette Pepsi CompaniesUnited Way of KnoxvilleUniversity of MichiganMohawk PaperCleveland IndiansThe City of CamdenPenn Foster Career SchoolCapital Cardiology AssociatesCollier Restaurant Group
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government33%
Financial Services Firm9%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business73%
Midsize Enterprise27%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DocStar ECM is ranked 24th in Enterprise Content Management while Objective ECM is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management. DocStar ECM is rated 9.6, while Objective ECM is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of DocStar ECM writes "It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and contract management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". DocStar ECM is most compared with , whereas Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.