• Home
  • DocStar ECM vs. Systemware ECM

DocStar ECM vs Systemware ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Epicor Logo

DocStar ECM

Read 7 DocStar ECM reviews
168 views|92 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Systemware Logo

Systemware ECM

90 views|83 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DocStar ECM and Systemware ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and...
* A/P Automation * H/R On boarding * Client/Vendor File Management * Contract Management
Use Systemware ECM?
Ranking
24th
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
168
Comparisons
92
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
28th
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
90
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
docSTAR eclipse
Learn More
Epicor
Systemware
Overview
Helping businesses translate vision into action for more than 20 years, DocStar offers delivers a flexible and innovative enterprise content management and process automation platform. Easy to implement and use—both in the cloud and on premises—DocStar proven technology and global process expertise empowers organizations to operate at peak performance, navigate change, and grow. By scaling and modernizing operations and enabling greater collaboration, DocStar allows data and transactions to flow efficiently throughout your organization. With increased visibility among employees, customers, and partners, we deliver better business outcomes such as increased auditability and greater ease of compliance.

Systemware has a product suite with a set of ECM components, including image and capture, records management, workfrom, archiving and output management. Systemware Content Cloud ECM provides a delivery option for customers to deploy their content management applications in an on-premises cloud.

Sample Customers
Gillette Pepsi CompaniesUnited Way of KnoxvilleUniversity of MichiganMohawk PaperCleveland IndiansThe City of CamdenPenn Foster Career SchoolCapital Cardiology AssociatesCollier Restaurant Group
Bank of America, 7-Eleven, American Bank of Texas, DTCC, MedSynergies
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business73%
Midsize Enterprise27%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DocStar ECM is ranked 24th in Enterprise Content Management while Systemware ECM is ranked 28th in Enterprise Content Management. DocStar ECM is rated 9.6, while Systemware ECM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of DocStar ECM writes "It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and contract management". On the other hand, DocStar ECM is most compared with , whereas Systemware ECM is most compared with IBM FileNet.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.