We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"It is quite good."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"It's very tedious to manage."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 25 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.