We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
