Compare Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform vs. Pega BPM
Sponsored
Use Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform vs. Pega BPM and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well."
"It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
Cons
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The vertical application could be improved."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."
"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
Information Not Available
"It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases."
"The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products."
"It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow."
"The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors."
"The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair."
"We mostly have a yearly license."
"The price is a bit expensive."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With… more »
Top Answer: Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with… more »
Top Answer: Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based… more »
Top Answer: Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata.
Top Answer: The price of Documentum could be lower. It's quite high compared to its competitors.
Top Answer: In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText… more »
Top Answer: The initial setup is pretty straightforward.
Top Answer: It's a great product, Pega, however, cost-wise, it is a little expensive compared to other BPM tools. That's where I… more »
Top Answer: The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed… more »
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Camunda BPM
Pegasystems, SmartBPM
Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.
With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.
EMC Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform (xCP) improves how you build applications. As a dynamic composition platform, xCP combines integrated technologies and prebuilt components with graphical modeling and configuration tools to emphasize composition and configuration over custom coding.
Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
Learn more about Pega BPM
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
CNAMTS
The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement
Financial Services Firm22%
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company22%
Non Profit11%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government7%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Financial Services Firm38%
Computer Software Company29%
Real Estate/Law Firm10%
Retailer5%
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise25%
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise76%
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform vs. Pega BPM and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 16 reviews. Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform is rated 7.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform writes "Documentum Enterprise Content Management (ECM) and xCelerated Composition Platform (xCP)". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform is most compared with Appian, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, K2 and Genpact Cora SeQuence, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM, Microsoft PowerApps and OutSystems. See our Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.