We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It is quite good."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
