We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"The stability is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 28th in Business Process Design. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with .
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
