We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"The stability is very good."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"The user interface can be improved."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 25 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.