Compare DocuShare vs. Hyland OnBase

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DocuShare Logo
1,117 views|942 comparisons
Hyland OnBase Logo
3,962 views|2,959 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability,… more »
Top Answer: They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.
Top Answer: For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are… more »
Ranking
Views
1,117
Comparisons
942
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
3,962
Comparisons
2,959
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
681
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OnBase
Learn More
Overview
Xerox DocuShare's Content Management System gives you the easiest method to manage all of your paper and digital documents
OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.
Offer
Learn more about DocuShare
Learn more about Hyland OnBase
Sample Customers
Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company20%
Computer Software Company17%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider8%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DocuShare is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management while Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. DocuShare is rated 0.0, while Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". DocuShare is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, Alfresco and Laserfiche Rio, whereas Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, SharePoint, Alfresco, IBM FileNet and Hyland Perceptive Content.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.