Compare DocuShare vs. IBM FileNet
Use DocuShare? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
"The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."
"Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not."
"My customers have seen ROI. There have been productivity gains, time savings gains, and things that they have been doing much more efficiently in a more modern way than they were before."
"It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed."
"We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency."
"The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do."
"Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
1,117
Comparisons
942
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
12,069
Comparisons
5,844
Reviews
31
Average Words per Review
773
Rating
8.3
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Xerox DocuShare's Content Management System gives you the easiest method to manage all of your paper and digital documents
IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.
There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.
Learn more about DocuShare
Learn more about IBM FileNet
Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group
Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Computer Software Company17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm33%
Insurance Company17%
Healthcare Company11%
Comms Service Provider8%
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company8%
No Data Available
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise65%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DocuShare is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 31 reviews. DocuShare is rated 0.0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Easy to integrate, and enables our clients to guarantee compliance". DocuShare is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Box and Alfresco, whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, IBM ECM, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.