DocuShare vs Objective ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xerox Logo
306 views|256 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Objective Logo
561 views|515 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DocuShare and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
306
Comparisons
256
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
561
Comparisons
515
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Xerox DocuShare's Content Management System gives you the easiest method to manage all of your paper and digital documents

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Sample Customers
Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Non Profit9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government33%
Financial Services Firm9%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise54%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DocuShare is ranked 20th in Enterprise Content Management while Objective ECM is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management. DocuShare is rated 8.0, while Objective ECM is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of DocuShare writes "The command line utilities allow bulk manipulation of documents". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". DocuShare is most compared with SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.