DocuShare vs Hyland Perceptive Content comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DocuShare and Hyland Perceptive Content based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
316
Comparisons
272
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
173
Comparisons
128
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ImageNow
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview
Xerox DocuShare's Content Management System gives you the easiest method to manage all of your paper and digital documents

Perceptive Content is a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content lifecycle, from capture to disposition. Flexible functionality across multiple business applications, integration with virtually any business application and a simple-to-use interface help Perceptive Content transform internal processes and the customer experience. Perceptive Content helps users work smarter by surfacing content in context with other relevant business information. Digital documents can be viewed simultaneously, which promotes enhanced collaboration and communication among employees, customers and vendors. Locating relevant documents in the context of a business process increases customer satisfaction and employee productivity. Automated lifecycle management helps organizations comply with their records and retention policies, which reduces the risk of compliance violations and resulting fees and fines.

Sample Customers
Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Non Profit9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
University20%
Government18%
Computer Software Company9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise54%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DocuShare is ranked 20th in Enterprise Content Management while Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 12th in Document Management Software. DocuShare is rated 8.0, while Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of DocuShare writes "The command line utilities allow bulk manipulation of documents". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hyland Perceptive Content writes "With workflows, a group of people can be working on appeals and forward them all to one queue". DocuShare is most compared with SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase, Box, SharePoint and Alfresco.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.