Compare Dome9 vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Dome9 is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Security with 3 reviews while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Cloud Workload Security with 6 reviews. Dome9 is rated 7.6, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dome9 writes "A powerful solution for our clients to effectively deal with problems unique to AWS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "Provides cross-cloud security but it isn't so user-friendly". Dome9 is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks , Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point CloudGuard SaaS, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Aqua Security, Dome9 and Sysdig Secure. See our Dome9 vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dome9 vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
All of the features are very useful in today's market.People implementing this solution are concerned with addressing a significant risk, and within the AWS realm, this tool does de-risk substantially.Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console.

Read more »

I would say Twistlock is a fairly sophisticated tool.The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass.The runtime mechanism on the solution is very useful. It's got very good network mapping between containers. If you have more than one container, you can create a content data link between them.The most valuable feature is that the rule set is managed and that it can be run on a regularly scheduled basis.It has helped us understand the dynamic topology of our containers, and manage security through the application of policies that our pipelines apply straight from Git.The dynamic workload identity creation, attestation, and assignment is the best feature. In addition, the application dependency map across heterogeneous environments for compliance is a striking feature.

Read more »

Cons
Dome9 should also support deployments that are on-premises and in a hybrid cloud.I would like to see some AI on the back-end, just to assist with doing analysis and making recommendations.I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level.

Read more »

In terms of improvement, there are some small things like hardening and making sure the Linux resources are deployed well but that's more at an operational level.Palo Alto should work on ease-of-use and the user-friendliness to be more competitive with some competing products.The innovation side of the solution could be more efficient and more detailed.The pricing for the solution needs improvement.I would like to see the inclusion of automated counter-attack, although this is probably illegal.More documentation with real-world use cases would be helpful.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year.The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
13,197
Comparisons
8,484
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
481
Avg. Rating
7.7
1st
Views
20,251
Comparisons
16,026
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
449
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Dome9 FlexPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
Learn
Check Point
Palo Alto Networks
Overview

CloudGuard Dome9 is a comprehensive software platform for public cloud security and compliance orchestration. Using Dome9, organizations can visualize and assess their security posture, detect misconfigurations, model and actively enforce security best practices, and protect against identity theft and data loss in the cloud. Dome9 delivers security capabilities across Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Learn more about Cloud Security Orchestration (Dome9)

The ability to quickly build and deploy global-scale applications has lead to the rapid adoption of public cloud infrastructure. Managing security at this scale hasn't kept up. Compounded by the accelerated development pace where DevOps teams sometimes push new releases into production daily, it’s no surprise security teams find themselves overwhelmed with lack of visibility, context and control despite the robust toolkits and capabilities offered by cloud service providers. Prisma Public Cloud redefines effective security and compliance management for today’s multi-cloud era.

Offer
Learn more about Dome9
Learn more about Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Sample Customers
Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology PartnersAmgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dome9 vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.