• Home
  • Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring vs. Icinga

Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring vs Icinga comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dotcom-Monitor Logo

Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring

106 views|96 comparisons
Icinga Logo

Icinga

Read 16 Icinga reviews
3,629 views|3,211 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring and Icinga based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring?
Lasse Wackers
It's a flexible platform that has powerful automation capabilities, but it's complicated and hard to learn
We use Icinga to measure the services our customers are available. In addition, we measure the KPI (Key Performance Indicators) to comply with the... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
  • "This is an open-source solution with paid support."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We're using the free version of Icinga."
  • "Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
  • "The solution is free to use."
  • "The solution is cheap."

    • More Icinga Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Icinga?
    Top Answer:The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?
    Top Answer:I wasn't involved with the finance side of the product. I just tested the product and gave feedback to the IT team in our company.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Icinga?
    Top Answer:I didn't have a problem with Icinga since I just use it for monitoring purposes. I haven't faced any issues with Icinga to date, and I think that it is a good solution. Right now, in my company… more »
    Read all 12 answers   →
    Ranking
    81st
    out of 108 in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    Views
    106
    Comparisons
    96
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    23rd
    out of 108 in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    Views
    3,629
    Comparisons
    3,211
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    596
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    BrowserView Monitoring
    Icinga Cloud Monitoring
    Learn More
    Dotcom-Monitor
    Icinga
    Overview
    Monitor the web page performance of your website as it is rendered in one of over 40 different browsers from locations around the world. Setup alerts to notify you if your webpage ever breaks or the page speed drops below acceptable levels.
    Icinga monitors infrastructures of all sizes with the integrated cluster system secured by SSL, Integrates with DevOps tools and uses an object based configuration or provision on users' monitoring code through the REST API. Icinga has a lightweight and extensible web interface to keep an eye on your environment and provides modules that extend the functionality of Icinga Web 2. Additionally, it offers a fully preconfigured monitoring stack or just add an external perspective.
    Sample Customers
    Citrix, Aflac, COMCAST, Dish Network, Dell, Volvo, Roanoke College, Trinity International University
    Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Educational Organization14%
    University14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring is ranked 81st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Icinga is ranked 23rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 16 reviews. Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring is rated 0.0, while Icinga is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Icinga writes "A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification". Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Icinga is most compared with Zabbix, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Centreon.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.