• Home
  • Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring and PRTG Network Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring?
Moeen Chowdhary
A flexible and proactive solution that made our infrastructure more reliable
The solution has helped our organization with proactive monitoring. It has made our infrastructure more reliable.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licenses are very expensive, so I would like to see cheaper licensing."
  • "If you're looking for a cost effective software I’d suggest this product."
  • "Sensors on free version can run out quick."
  • "The ability to use the base version with 100 free sensors is great. The cost on other packages can be very reasonable."
  • "When you buy PRTG, everything comes in one bundle. Licensing is very easy."
  • "The price was pretty good, very competitive."
  • "The pricing is not too bad. It's not massively expensive, and the ability to upscale or even downscale licenses every year is brilliant for us."
  • "On a yearly basis, I believe it's between £1,200 and £1,500."

    • More PRTG Network Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
    I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want using these, but they require quite some expertise before you can use them. Then there are the ones that are not open source, the enterprise softwares and cost you some money, but on the other hand, they are extremely easy to set-up and learn. You can have them up and running in a matter of minutes. And then there are those which are completely cloud based. They can be free of cost or charge some money depending on the software. The good thing about these is that you don’t have to install any extra software, and it can be managed completely online but then again these have limited features and you cannot exploit them to the full extent as you can do with the open-source and to some extent the enterprise software, so I won’t suggest you to use these, because these are generally not the complete solutions and require other support software to achieve the same. Below I have listed the outstanding pros and cons of the various Network analyzers that you can look into Nagios Pros: Nagios offers an extensive set of collector plug-ins that allows users to gather performance and availability data from a broad range of operating systems, including  Windows and Netware Nagios… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
    Top Answer:PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device and… more »
    Read all 18 answers   →
    What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?
    Top Answer:The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.
    Read all 72 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Moni...
    Top Answer:PRTG Network Monitor is cheap.
    Read all 62 answers   →
    Ranking
    81st
    out of 108 in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    Views
    106
    Comparisons
    96
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 108 in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    Views
    10,631
    Comparisons
    7,323
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    462
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    BrowserView Monitoring
    Learn More
    Dotcom-Monitor
    Paessler AG
    Overview
    Monitor the web page performance of your website as it is rendered in one of over 40 different browsers from locations around the world. Setup alerts to notify you if your webpage ever breaks or the page speed drops below acceptable levels.

    PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

    To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

    Sample Customers
    Citrix, Aflac, COMCAST, Dish Network, Dell, Volvo, Roanoke College, Trinity International University
    Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Construction Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization45%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government6%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise54%
    Large Enterprise29%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring is ranked 81st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 6th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 96 reviews. Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring is rated 0.0, while PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". Dotcom-Monitor BrowserView Monitoring is most compared with , whereas PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and ManageEngine OpManager.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.