Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring vs Elastic Observability comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring and Elastic Observability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."
  • "There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
  • "Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."
  • "The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."
  • "Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."
  • "One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."
  • "Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."
  • "We will buy a premium license after POC."
  • More Elastic Observability Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization.
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap.
    Top Answer:Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema.
    Ranking
    Views
    172
    Comparisons
    145
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    12,578
    Comparisons
    10,372
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    455
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UserView Monitoring
    Learn More
    Overview
    Monitor complex transactions on your website with real browsers. Record a user session interacting with a website. Monitor the functionality and performance of website features such as logins, shopping carts, searches and more. Interact with complex Rich Internet Applications (RIA) such as Flash, Silverlight and AJAX. If you can perform the action using a desktop or mobile browser, you can monitor the actions with UserView.
    To effectively monitor and gain insights across your distributed systems, you need to have all your observability data in one stack. Break down silos by bringing together application, infrastructure, and user data into a unified solution for end-to-end observability and alerting.
    Rely on the most widely deployed observability platform available, built on the proven Elastic Stack (also known as the ELK Stack) to converge silos, delivering unified visibility and actionable insights.
    Sample Customers
    American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College, Trinity International University
    PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring is ranked 73rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring is rated 0.0, while Elastic Observability is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Datadog and Sentry.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.