Drupal vs XWiki SAS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Drupal Logo
1,757 views|1,233 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
XWiki Logo
58 views|48 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Drupal and XWiki SAS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would like to see better pricing."
  • More Drupal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    1,757
    Comparisons
    1,233
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    58
    Comparisons
    48
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications

    XWiki is a powerful Open Source knowledge management platform that helps businesses save time and budget while enhancing collaboration on both team and organizational levels. It allows users across different departments to stay on the same page by accessing critical information in a fast and efficient way. Email overload, the loss of important knowledge when key employees leave are long forgotten and silos are reduced. With XWiki, vital information is only a click away, training and operations costs are reduced and data loss is prevented through regular backups. 

    XWiki is developed thinking of extensibility, adaptability, and flexibility. It comes with over 750 apps and extensions and allows for endless customization. Moreover, App Within Minutes allows even non-technical users to create their own extensions to address specific needs with custom solutions and continue collaborating efficiently. Because every business is different, XWiki is available both on-premise and Cloud, and, since there is no vendor lock-in, switching between the two is possible at any time.

    Sample Customers
    BMJ, The Economist, New Republic, SpaceX, Lush, Danone, Tesla Motors, Peugeot, Stanford Law, Harvard, Oxford University, MIT Media Lab, The Beatles, MTV UK, The Weather Channel, NBC, BBC, grammy.com, Mus_e du Louvre, Whitehouse.gov, London.gov.uk, Gouvernment.fr, New Zealand Government, The Prince of Wales, British Council, NYC Metropolitan Transport Authority, Gatwick Obviously
    Amazon, Lenovo,  EMC, Cap Gemini, Crédit Mutuel Arkea, Brabantia, Électricité de France, Aelia, Energisa, Meetic, Chronopost. More references: http://www.xwiki.com/en/refere...
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Marketing Services Firm20%
    Media Company20%
    Non Profit20%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while XWiki SAS is ranked 13th in Knowledge Management Software. Drupal is rated 8.6, while XWiki SAS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS and Atlassian Confluence, whereas XWiki SAS is most compared with Atlassian Confluence.

    We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.