We compared Druva inSync and Rubrik Go across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Druva inSync is praised for its user-friendly interface, adaptability, and automated ransomware detection. It provides cloud accessibility, customizable backup policies, and efficient data recovery. Rubrik Go is highly regarded for its impressive data visualization capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Users say Druva inSync could improve resource efficiency and enhance security with user-level encryption keys. Rubrik Go needs to address its expensive pricing and improve security visibility.
Service and Support: Druva has been praised for its excellent customer support, with users highlighting the prompt and helpful assistance provided. Rubrik Go's support is recognized for its timely and effective resolution of customer issues.
Ease of Deployment: The initial setup process for Druva inSync is generally straightforward and can be completed in less than half an hour, but the total deployment time may be longer for complex environments. Rubrik Go is straightforward to set up and can be installed in just one day.
Pricing: Druva inSync’s pricing is considered simple and inexpensive, with no extra fees or licensing expenses. Rubrik Go is known for its higher pricing, which is charged on a monthly basis.
ROI: Users have provided limited information about the ROI of Druva inSync so far. Rubrik Go offers a varying return. To obtain detailed insights, refer to user feedback or reach out to the respective providers.
Comparison Results: Druva inSync is regarded as an affordable, adaptable solution that’s effortless to set up. Users love Druva’s automated ransomware capabilities and helpful customer service. Reviews say Druva can improve security by adding user-level encryption, and some complained that the solution is too resource-intensive. Rubrik Go stands out for its solid support and exceptional data visualization capabilities. Users say Rubrik Go needs to address its high cost and improve security visibility.
"We get control over authentication policies and create an agentless backup by generating a token for that."
"Our customers do not need to purchase third party storage or a separate server for data backup."
"It's incredibly fast."
"The main benefit of this solution is that it automatically scans the files for ransomware after the backup is complete."
"It has a straightforward installation."
"The tool has good features. The backup is also accurate."
"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."
"Druva inSync is very easy to use."
"Rubrik Go is very simple to use."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use for backing up VMs."
"Even though the data is already in the cloud, it's an AWS, so by accessing the on-prem appliance you can still search because it is indexed from that appliance."
"The standout feature is its ransomware protection capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good."
"In terms of stability, the product is good."
"Rubrik Go's best feature is data visualization."
"It has an easy-to-use interface that is not complicated."
"It would be good if bare metal backups were possible."
"The solution takes a lot of time during restoration."
"The one area that needs to improve is the pricing."
"I would like to see security improved in the next release."
"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of an on-premise backup feature, as currently, they are offering everything in the cloud."
"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."
"The speed could be better."
"Druva inSync is very high in price. A general customer cannot afford this solution. Even if the product is good, people cannot afford such a high cost just for taking the backup. This is a recurring investment, and the customers have to pay for it every year. Druva is also yet to develop the channel and the channel or partner commitment."
"Being a modern backup solution, Rubrik should have an option to back up a Kubernetes cluster."
"Rubrik Go's security visibility could be improved."
"The tool's pricing needs to be improved."
"Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."
"Reporting could be improved. For now, it's only exported to CSB files."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team."
"You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go."
Druva inSync is ranked 7th in SaaS Backup with 13 reviews while Rubrik Go is ranked 8th in SaaS Backup with 10 reviews. Druva inSync is rated 8.2, while Rubrik Go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Druva inSync writes "Excellent cloud based functionality, highly reliable, with high speed and flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Robust ransomware protection, scalability, and suitability for enterprise environments makes it a top choice for data management needs". Druva inSync is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Commvault Cloud and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with AWS Backup, Commvault Cloud and Own Backup and Recovery. See our Druva inSync vs. Rubrik Go report.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
