We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable aspect is the authentication and the SSO."
"It is a good solution for hybrid environments and VPN."
"The two-factor login is great. I receive a message and just have to press okay."
"It meets our security needs very well. It is easy to use, and documentation is also available. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is also very good. We are satisfied with this solution."
"The push notifications and the integrations they offer are valuable. Their mobile app is very useful. It is very easy to use."
"The multi-factor authentication process and the geo-locking features are great."
"Scalable and stable."
"Removing the need for a password would be a positive change as well as the ability to cover all the different enterprise applications. They don't have coverage for everything."
"The dashboard needs to be improved."
"Certain customers can not use this product because it is cloud-based."
"Its documentation must be in French because we are a French-speaking country. They should also provide more training documentation. Its management interface should also be improved. They should also improve its update period. If I compare its update period with other products such as Palo Alto firewalls, this solution is really slow in updates."
"The only time I really had some negative feedback for them was about the UI of their mobile app, but they improved it in the last version. It is good on the functionality side, but their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. If you are on a monthly term or a yearly contract, you basically pay the same price, and that is very unusual. Normally, there is a discount when someone signs up for the 12-month system."
"We had some trouble with the password reset function."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"During testing we are allowed a certain number of licenses for free."
"Its price is reasonable. It is not highly expensive."
"Their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing costs."
"Our licensing fee is currently on an annual basis."
Duo Security is ranked 2nd in Authentication Systems with 6 reviews while SafeNet Authentication Manager is ranked 10th in Authentication Systems with 1 review. Duo Security is rated 8.4, while SafeNet Authentication Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Duo Security writes "A highly-scalable multi-factor authentication solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeNet Authentication Manager writes "Simple to use; stable and scalable". Duo Security is most compared with Microsoft Authenticator, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Fortinet FortiToken, Yubico YubiKey and UserLock, whereas SafeNet Authentication Manager is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiToken, RSA Authentication Manager, CRYPTOCARD BlackShield and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.