We performed a comparison between DX NetOps and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."
"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."
"The solution is stable."
"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."
"The AI is the best feature in this solution."
"The event correlation is pretty robust. The GUI is pretty good."
"Analytics is the most valuable feature. The business service summaries in the dashboards and the correlations for the SIEM are also valuable features."
"Both the collecting logs and duo correlation are valuable features for us."
"It's very easy for anyone to work with."
"It is used as an alerting platform."
"We're able to get real-timec as well as our customer networks that we're monitoring at all times."
"The solution’s IP database is awesome."
"Analytics. It can provide log information from the device. With log information, I can see if there is a threat"
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."
"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."
"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."
"They need to integrate better with Cisco and Palo Alto."
"Network detection and response is a separate product."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"There is no proper guide for integration or configuration."
"Creating parsers to try make unknown events or currently unsupported devices produce meaningful information is extremely cumbersome."
"When our team tried configuring logs for Microsoft SQL, it did not work."
"FortiSIEM is not a market leader in the SIEM space."
"The only drawback is the licensing model. It can get expensive if you want to integrate more solutions."
DX NetOps is ranked 32nd in Network Monitoring Software with 5 reviews while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 9th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 63 reviews. DX NetOps is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DX NetOps writes "Good performance, simple setup, and helpful for root cause analysis". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". DX NetOps is most compared with DX Spectrum, SolarWinds NPM, AppNeta by Broadcom, PRTG Network Monitor and IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, LogRhythm SIEM and Wazuh.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.