"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."
"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."
"You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem."
"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."
"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."
"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."
"Scalable solution for tracking and syncing through the Infoblox grid."
"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."
"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."
"CA PM Business Hours Filtering: I understand that all monitoring systems have defects. The Business Hours Filtering does not always function properly. Sometimes, when applying business hours to CA PM reports that are 30 or more days in duration, the report generation times out and does not display results. We have other CA PM reports that, when we apply Business Hours Filtering, the report results displayed are the same as without the filter. We are not sure if this is a defect in CA PM or if it is a result of our complex configuration (folder structure) and application of business hours."
"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."
"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."
"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"Lacks network overview for the entire connected network."
Earn 20 points
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in DX NetOps. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] writes "Has the ability to track and sync through the grid". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
