Most Helpful Review
Offers a single pane of glass that allows views into inventory, code version management, and inner operations with...
Hybrid Fortinet Fabric Solutions with a comprehensive view for all Fortinet products and a little support for other...
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM (AccelOps) and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
It is a central solution in terms of how to actually use it. It has a very easy dashboard. Everything is concise. We are able to create custom sensors. For different parts of the business, we have many products across many environments, and it works for everything.
The fact that I can use custom MIB files to customize my sensors for the things that are not there as a default is a good feature.
The most valuable feature is the ability to span multiple technologies and multiple vendors.
We can see trends for a lot of different things, such as hard drive space and bandwidth usage. We can see and plan for the future by knowing, "We're sort of at 75% capacity now. In three months time, we know we're going to be up to 90%,so we need to plan ahead for it, getting upgrades booked in place." Since things like this take time and effort, it's handy to see trends into the future of where our company is going.
The solution provides us with needed feedback on our IT infrastructure. It gives us really good quality of service when it comes to monitoring of available space and available resources. It allows us to preempt issues before they become a problem for the business.
It is easy to use and intuitive, which is really important. It does what it says on the box by giving you a visual of the state of what is going on at any one time.
It is pretty simple to use, which is always a good thing. It's been very reliable in updating us if any issues crop up.
We use the remote probes a lot for our branch offices. Instead of deploying the full instance of PRTG, we'll put a remote probe out there. This simplifies the whole deployment for us.
Offers a single pane of glass to view inventory, code version management, and inner operations.
The most valuable feature is the auto-discovery, which is nice because you don't have to do anything to add a new component.
We were able to standardize the internal processes across all internal departments, resulting in almost an elimination of non-standard process flows through our organization.
I have found the cross analysis feature to be the most valuable.
The Spectrum tool improved our network assurance levels for our business units.
All networks (or network equipment) are monitored through CA Spectrum.
To add workers and even collectors is pretty easy.
The seamless integration with FortiGate is the solution's most valuable aspect.
Both the collecting logs and duo correlation are valuable features for us.
The solution is very stable. It's run for years without the need to do anything except, add new patches when they are available, which are always a good idea to install.
Analytics is the most valuable feature. The business service summaries in the dashboards and the correlations for the SIEM are also valuable features.
The most valuable feature is the dashboard. CMDB database collects data from a lot of pre-configured devices.
The interface is very easy to use. The connector in the core has FortiSIEM support from the vendor.
It gives us the opportunity to generate notifications based upon rules that get triggered, and the rules could be specific to PCI, HIPAA, GIBA, NIST, and so forth.
With custom sensors, there is a lot of work which needs to be done in the background, just for it to be tailor-made for the specific thing that we are actually monitoring. We take a lot of time with the custom sensors. I would like to see the customer sensor be more robust and a bit more varied.
I have an issue with DFS, distributed file services... there isn't one by default. Taking into account the difference between DFS and DFSR as well would be great.
The dashboarding definitely needs improvement.
The only sort of limitation is the actual probes. So, if you don't have enough probes on there, you can over flip them and cause the WMI sensors and SNMP sensors to sort of overload. Sometimes, they might timeout for a minute, but they do come back.
The desktop app is the one area where it do with some improvement. From a user's perspective, I would like to be able to get more out of the desktop app as opposed to where we are now with it.
While the desktop app is good, they could slightly improve it. We would like it to be a single pane of glass. At the moment, you can only see certain portions of information. You have to scroll through to make it more granular. We want them to develop the desktop app to be more user-friendly.
Once you start going above 5000 sensors, things do start to get a bit shaky. There are some best practice out there that you will need to adopt and be aware of.
We would like more cloud native sensors for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, etc. A lot of businesses are moving in that direction, so having something where we can pull performance stats out of these cloud services would be great for us.
The company is trying desperately to sustain the platform by bolting on changes to it to enhance it. It is not a long-term solution.
The interface is not nice and needs to be improved.
We want to make our own choice for the AIOps solution and do not want to be forced to use the Broadcom OI solution by default.
For us, the implementation was quite complex but it's because of the large number of different environments we're dealing with.
The CA Technologies sales team destroyed their relationship with our business units.
It needs better integration with other CA products.
OS monitoring needs to be better developed, as well as their services, e.g., cluster monitoring, URLs, etc.
The dashboard needs to improve.
When compared with some competitors, in terms of performance, the CPU and RAM requirements and the capability of coordination with development all need some improvement.
The support of the product changed recently, and I don't think it's for the better. They should work to improve the support they offer to clients.
They could work on their documentation. If there's anything about the solution that needs improvement, it's that. For example, documentation already is on a very high level but specifically on the CLI there are tons of features which can be fine-tuned and thousands of commands are very difficult to document. If they could make this easier, it would improve the overall solution.
Their product support, in general, is not that great. The product support is in the same ecosystem. Their support is improving but it's not that great.vvv
The performance can be improved. Sometimes it takes a long time to fetch data.
The nodes on our network did not comply with the SIEM solution. They use a different format parking log.
The backup and recovery process for this solution needs improvement.
Pricing and Cost Advice
We used a product called SolarWinds in the past, and its cost was high. Whereas, PRTG came in at a third of SolarWind's cost.
Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do.
Our licensing costs are 10,000 euros over three years.
At the moment I'm only using 500 sensors. I pay yearly, so it's a cost that's easily swallowed.
We have an unlimited perpetual license, so we just pay support costs and it can scale throughout the organization.
We looked at PRTG and SolarWinds. From a cost side perspective, compared to PRTG, and from what you get back from it, PRTG was sort of a hands down the winner.
While I am not the person who deals with pricing, I would say that we pay around 1000 pounds a year.
It is about £4,500 for the first year, then about another 15 to 20 percent annually after that. So, we are looking at about £1000 running costs a year. When you think about how much an outage costs per minute, it's negligible.
The product, support, and maintenance are all expensive, which is another reason that we are switching to another solution.
In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management).
We bought the perpetual license, so we own the product, but there is a three-year support renewal fee for that.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
|CA Spectrum can enable your organization to discover, optimize and improve its infrastructure and the business services running on top of it. By delivering large-enterprise scalability, robust features and superior root cause analysis, this solution can help your organization effectively manage its dynamic, complex IT infrastructure including physical, virtual and cloud environments as well as network virtualization.|
FortiSIEM (formerly AccelOps 4) provides an actionable security intelligence platform to monitor security, performance and compliance through a single pane of glass.
Companies around the world use FortiSIEM for the following use cases:
Get ahead of IT infrastructure issues
With PRTG Network Monitor you can identify and solve potential issues before it affects anyone. Download a free 30-day trial today and experience the benefits of 24-hour IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
Learn more about DX Spectrum
Learn more about Fortinet FortiSIEM (AccelOps)
|Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank||National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi||FortiSIEM has hundreds of customers worldwide in markets including managed services, technology, financial services, healthcare, and government. Customers include Aruba Networks, Compushare, Port of San Diego, Cleveland Indians, Infoblox, Healthways, and Referentia.|
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Health, Wellness And Fitness Company4%
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Software R&D Company37%
Comms Service Provider21%
Comms Service Provider14%
Software R&D Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%