Compare DX Spectrum vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DX Spectrum Logo
8,049 views|4,007 comparisons
IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
1,449 views|1,028 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I have found the cross analysis feature to be the most valuable.""We were able to standardize the internal processes across all internal departments, resulting in almost an elimination of non-standard process flows through our organization.""The most valuable feature is the auto-discovery, which is nice because you don't have to do anything to add a new component.""This product provides good visibility into applications at the backend.""What I like best is the configuration management functionality.""The most valuable feature is automatic discovery.""The fault management is perfect.""The most valuable feature is the ability to put health checks in place not only for the infrastructure but for some of the services that are on top of the infrastructure."

More DX Spectrum Pros »

"The scalability of monitoring, the breadth of supported network components, the scale of the number of monitoring events, and the flexibility in customization make this a well-rounded product.""Anything is possible with Tivoli. It's quite a robust system.""Support is one of the best aspects of this solution. NetCool is a good product that has good flexibility. There are a lot of documents available online which is one of the best features of IBM Tivoli Suite. Whenever an issue happens, rather than going to technical support, if you find the exact issue in Google, you can get tech notes for that particular issue.""The solution has very good integration capabilities."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool Pros »

Cons
"For us, the implementation was quite complex but it's because of the large number of different environments we're dealing with.""We want to make our own choice for the AIOps solution and do not want to be forced to use the Broadcom OI solution by default.""The interface is not nice and needs to be improved.""There should be a facility to integrate with other monitoring applications that are currently running in the environment.""Huawei devices are not properly supported, and there are incompatibility issues related to certain protocols.""Event correlation only works on one server, rather than on all of the servers in the same cluster environment.""I think the management or configuration of devices needs some improvement.""Integration with some other tools, and integration with some Network Packet Broker, need some improvement."

More DX Spectrum Cons »

"Customization and integration that you need to do to make the product fit your needs is very complex. It is not a product that somebody could easily pick up without any prior training or experience.""The solution is not user-friendly.""In terms of improvement, I would like to see more AIOps, Artificial Intelligent Operations in the next release. IBM develops new features for Power BI or Cognos Analytics, which is good. As of now, we use Cognos Analytics, we are not using Power BI. They have the Insight concept but we don't like that.""The solution is too expensive."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management).""The product, support, and maintenance are all expensive, which is another reason that we are switching to another solution.""The price is very high."

More DX Spectrum Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The presentation layer is pretty simple and straightforward.
Top Answer: The price is very high. It makes it very difficult with respect to the business because, with any other product, we have to look at a lower-cost licensing model. It would have to be much lower than… more »
Top Answer: The visual is good but it's a little archaic. I think it's the way it's compiled, because I've been struggling recently with deploying it in different departments. The software still uses a 32 bit… more »
Top Answer: I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all kind of software in monitoring from infra to end to end, it depends on the… more »
Top Answer: The solution has very good integration capabilities.
Top Answer: The solution is too expensive. The product isn't the easiest to use. There's a lot of complexity and it isn't easy to manage. The initial setup is not straightforward. The product needs to provide… more »
Ranking
Views
8,049
Comparisons
4,007
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
466
Rating
7.9
Views
1,449
Comparisons
1,028
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
566
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Spectrum
Tivoli NetCool
Learn More
Overview
CA Spectrum can enable your organization to discover, optimize and improve its infrastructure and the business services running on top of it. By delivering large-enterprise scalability, robust features and superior root cause analysis, this solution can help your organization effectively manage its dynamic, complex IT infrastructure including physical, virtual and cloud environments as well as network virtualization.
IBM Tivoli Netcool delivers near real-time, consolidated event management across business infrastructure, data centers, complex networks and IT domains. The software provides full management and automation to help you deliver continuous uptime of business services and applications.
Offer
Learn more about DX Spectrum
Learn more about IBM Tivoli NetCool
Sample Customers
National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi
Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Healthcare Company14%
Insurance Company12%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DX Spectrum is ranked 1st in Network Management Applications with 9 reviews while IBM Tivoli NetCool is ranked 8th in Network Management Applications with 4 reviews. DX Spectrum is rated 7.8, while IBM Tivoli NetCool is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of DX Spectrum writes "Good monitoring, alerting capabilities, and improved visibility, but AIOps is restricted to Broadcom". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli NetCool writes "Enables us to tailor the solution to the particular requirements of a customer". DX Spectrum is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, DX NetOps, Zabbix, Splunk and DX Infrastructure Manager, whereas IBM Tivoli NetCool is most compared with SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Micro Focus Network Node Manager, N-able N-central, Cisco DNA Center and Cisco Prime. See our DX Spectrum vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool report.

See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.