Jason ReidFounder, Managing Director at AssureStor Limited
Anonymous UserTechincal Support at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Compared to other products, Auvik's pricing is more feasible since you get all its features. You pay for licenses on a per network device basis. It monitors hypervisors, but does not bill for that. There are no additional costs, which is something that I like."
"The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device."
"Its pricing is a little on the high end. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. It is more expensive than other solutions, but their per-device model is very fair. Anything other than the networking gear is monitored by Auvik at no charge."
"The value is there. It's not that expensive per device and it's licensed per device. Unlike some of the other tools that I use, it's not real expensive. It's a good value for the price."
"It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes."
"As an individual IP company, Auvik is a little bit pricey. It is a little expensive, but as an MSP owner, I have a small side business. So, I'm an Auvik customer in that sense too. In that, I think it's reasonable to pay $10 to $15 a device or less depending on the endpoint. For the amount of capability that it has, it is very reasonably priced."
"In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management)."
"The product, support, and maintenance are all expensive, which is another reason that we are switching to another solution."
"The price is very high."
Earn 20 points
Auvik is cloud-based software that simplifies and automates network monitoring and management to give you complete network visibility and control.
Designed to deploy in minutes, you’ll resolve problems faster than ever with real-time network mapping and inventory, powerful troubleshooting features, deep network traffic insights, automated config backups and restore, and more. https://www.auvik.com/get-free-trial
The StackState AIOps platform is a unique offering as we combine:
- Topology – view all components and all their dependencies, on prem and cloud;
- Telemetry – see all metrics, events and logs per component, regardless of its source;
- Tracing – insights into end-to-end customer journey at code level;
- Time travelling – travel back to any moment in time.
We make this possible through our unique version graph database (the so called 4T model).
Again, all combined in one model, one view. Future ready as new technologies will be launched and will be included into StackState’s AIOps platform.
On top of this platform we offer state of the art AI capabilities for:
- Root Cause Analysis;
- Impact Analysis;
- Predictive Analytics;
- Anomaly detection;
- Remediation and Automation
This helps our customer to drastically reduce Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). All together this makes StackState the only vendor today which makes AIOps a reality.
DX Spectrum is ranked 14th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 10 reviews while StackState is ranked 52nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. DX Spectrum is rated 7.8, while StackState is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of DX Spectrum writes "Good monitoring, alerting capabilities, and improved visibility, but AIOps is restricted to Broadcom". On the other hand, DX Spectrum is most compared with DX NetOps, SolarWinds NPM, Splunk, Zabbix and DX Performance Management, whereas StackState is most compared with Datadog, Splunk Insights for Infrastructure, Moogsoft, Zabbix and Scout APM.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.