• Home
  • DXC Cloud Services vs. REAN Cloud [EOL]

DXC Cloud Services vs REAN Cloud [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
3rd
out of 23 in Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers
Views
98
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers
Comparisons
Learn More
DXC Technology
Hitachi Vantara
Overview

DXC Cloud Solutions for Azure, AWS and VMware enable companies to focus on their strategic priorities while shifting the burden and expense of building and managing a hybrid cloud infrastructure.

REAN Cloud's core belief is to enable small and large businesses to reap the benefits of cloud in a way that is CRISP - Clear, Repeatable, Innovative, Simple and Powerful. REAN does this by using automation modules and blueprints that are integrated to help achieve IT reference architecture pattern implementations.

Sample Customers
Zurich Insurance, SpecSavers, Paragon Community Housing, Government of South Australia, National Pharmacies, Matador Group
Teradata, Symantec, Fuze, Spirent, Red Hat, Telos, Riverbed, NetApp, Infoblox, Alexion, Radian, Phillips, Palo Alto Networks, DARPA, Qualys

DXC Cloud Services is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers while REAN Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers. DXC Cloud Services is rated 0.0, while REAN Cloud [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, DXC Cloud Services is most compared with TCS Cloud Infrastructure Services, whereas REAN Cloud [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.