We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Alluvio Aternity based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Dynatrace is the preferred option over Alluvio Aternity due to its more comprehensive features such as real user monitoring, session replay, and synthetic monitoring functionalities, as well as AI capabilities for automating incident alerts and topology visualization. While Alluvio Aternity provides valuable data on machine health and performance, users suggest that it could benefit from more customizable reporting options and detailed performance counters.
"The most valuable features for us are the Incident Management dashboard, Application Status dashboard, and Activity Analysis UI."
"Other features we use heavily are the WiFi analyzer, the Skype for Business analyzer, and the troubleshooting functionalities. We also use the Device Health quite religiously here for troubleshooting devices that are unhealthy, when we're talking about things like high CPU or memory consumption, or file system problems within the users' workstations."
"The detailed level of information you are able to get on the complete environment all of the way down to a specific machine."
"The most valuable feature for me is being able to monitor the productivity of every employee in the company as well as third-party, outsourced companies that work on our behalf."
"There are many valuable features. If I had to single out one, it would be the UXI score. That's a proprietary Aternity score that tells you how good or bad the experience is for a user on that particular machine, for a particular app. It neatly encapsulates the pain of the user in a single score. It's very easy to find issues and then drill down further into those issues, based on that score."
"It is a tool that helps me check users' computers really quickly without having a help desk administrator logging in and doing analysis. Anyone who has access to Aternity, including our support team, can log onto Aternity and do a quick, basic analysis."
"Being able to proactively identify issues on user systems."
"The infrastructure data, especially the CPU and memory data, is per second, which makes it outstanding as compared to other solutions. Its licensing cost is very low for us."
"Knowing what services are impacted by infrastructure host issues is critical to the service we offer."
"It can give a quick overview of the current health status, end to end, and can quickly point to the root cause if there an issue or problem in one of our applications."
"Global overview of all app layers, including web servers."
"Interrelating the logs and infrastructure issues, application issues, DC RUM, everything in one dashboard, saves us time in troubleshooting."
"The overall application monitoring ability to do alerts."
"UEM (RUM): User Experience Management (real user monitoring) puts you in "user's seat" and gives you insight into how they experience the application. Often, this gives a totally different view than just watching the backend calls."
"I can get everything on a single page."
"Dynatrace can look into application transactions at the packet level, which pretty much relieves us of the work of manually collecting, analyzing, summarizing, and presenting the data, as we had done in the past."
"I would improve the dashboard, the presentation player."
"The licensing model doesn't suit the market we are in and has room for improvement."
"To monitor these transactions, you need to look at it, analyze it and capture it. It requires a little bit of work, but in an environment like ours, you need it to be easier."
"We are waiting for the GA release of their agent. I hope they can do better when they release their endpoint agents. Right now, we are not able to measure some applications, core applications, because it's relying on a specific version of the agent and that agent has not come out yet and there's no ETA. I would like to see them speed up time to market when they release agents."
"I would say the reporting capabilities of this product could use room for improvement."
"I can see the location and computer model and I can see a bunch of different attributes. But one thing I can't see is the Internet Explorer version."
"Some of the dashboarding and reporting on the analytics side could be improved. I think they realize it. Obviously, some of the desktop monitoring metrics always can be improved."
"Aternity doesn't currently provide metrics about actual employee experience of all business-critical apps. It's something you have to build out. It's not 'canned' that way and there is a lot of configuration that you have to do to the environment to collect the data you want to collect and that is important to you."
"Ability to better identify SDQ script errors would be helpful."
"They need a capability similar to Tealeaf where you can actually view what the consumer is doing and record the sessions. That is the biggest missing element."
"There are a lot of features that could be added that would make this a very useful solution, but it is getting there."
"Experience with relationship/account manager has been really poor, it does not seem to be the firm's priority to support their customers."
"I would like to see the ability to pull more user-friendly reports."
"One piece that we think that's missing is, there were thread names that were missing in analytical information in the Dynatrace solution, versus the AppMon solution. The AppMon solution gives you that information, and it is very helpful for connecting dots and bringing all the pieces together."
"Setting up the thresholds and alerting, it is complicated to understand their use cases."
"I would like to see AppMon also integrated in the Dynatrace portal. There are certain features, which I am not saying are not there in Dynatrace, but I am used to in AppMon."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 4th in Mobile APM with 37 reviews while Dynatrace is ranked 1st in Mobile APM with 340 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.4, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Not only helped us know which devices to refresh, but helped us determine if a refresh was even necessary, with factual data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Nexthink, SysTrack, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Dynatrace report.
See our list of best Mobile APM vendors and best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
We did a trial of the Dynatrace vs AppDynamics vs New Relic Real User
Monitoring tools and based on this we selected New Relic, mainly because of
their powerful Insights tool that easily allows you to create your own
dashboards / alert using a variant of SQL.
Since we acquired the RUM tool (Browser) we have trialled their APM tool
which we are currently appraising vs our existing CA APM tool (Introscope)
- early signs are encouraging for New Relic.
After 9 months we have found the New Relic tools that we use to be very
useful and they have excellent post implementation support.
Being SAAS only has not been an issue, and for example on Black Friday
their tools did not slowdown at all.
Hello,
Thank you all for the very kind and informative comments.
Some ideas regarding the requirement list.
Looking at a high level, the requirement list will contain:
- This is strategic tool, so go after the big/leading names.
- Easy remote deployment& management.
- Quick learning curve and strong local support.
- Flexible& competitive pricing model.
Technically speaking:
- Client side application level support: Browser based, Mobile Native App., Smart (Fat..) desktop
applications (mainly in Microsoft environment - .Net , C#).
- Client side Operating Systems: Mobile (iOS, Android), Desktop (Win7 and up).
- Server side Operating Systems: Linux, Windows.
- Virtualization: Microsoft, VMware,Citrix.
- Various server side applications (DB,ESB, HDFS....).
-Features:
Easy to set thresholds and automatic "trigger to action" capabilities.
Management console that can show information from a different customers in an easy way.
Another question I struggled with:
How do you deal with Information Security issues of remote connection to the client's production environments (both technical and business agreement aspects) ?
Best,
Avi
Avi,
How are you ?
I am Elad and I am the COO at Correlsense.
HQ in Boston and R&D site in Israel we have a very extensive partnership program that we have signed with companies that have the offering you describe here.
Would be happy to talk : eladk@correlsense.com
I am looking forward to talking to you.
Regards,
Hi Avi,
A lot of technical aspects had been discussed, but in my experience the most valued features include>
Multi Tenancy
Service Level Management Module is mandatory which supports service, calendars, offerings, etc.
Another great feature is the monitoring tool, which must support agent and agentless deployment
The thing is:
Measure -> Manage -> Improve
Hi,
What about Correlsense?
Thier APM product is called Sharepath and they are based in Israel.
Good luck
Hi Avi,
I AM biased working for CA Technologies but have you considered us?
We have recently released some highly innovative updates to our APM suite and work with quite a number of MSPs globally - I think you would be pleasantly surprised if we had a chance to take you through our capabilities.
Kind Regards
Paul Casaneanu
CA Technologies
Hi Avi,
My name is Gil and I've been working with APM solutions since 2005 when it just began. In my experience, it is most important for you to define your requirements from the APM platform, besides its pricing, before starting to evaluate solutions.
Let me give you some examples:
- Do you need to provide useful information for developers when there is an application problem and pin point the problem ?
- Do you need to monitor the full end to end user experience of global customers accessing sites and mobile apps for your customers and also gain some insights about the specific user session ?
- What technologies are required to be monitored ?
- Can you install anything on the client machines (if not - for example Aternity is not on the table) ?
- Do you need some auto discovery capabilities with regards to architectures, data flows, dynamic baselines, etc. ?
So you see, there isn't a simple answer. That being said, from my experience in the past 5 years, I found the Dynatrace platform the be the most complete one, and suited for both small and large companies. Additionally, the fact that it has 750 people in R&D makes me sleep well at night when my customers are using this platform. I don't have a hands on experience with AppD or Atternity, but have seen the customers comparing Dynatrace to them and heard about their reasons for making a choice.
Hope this helps,
Gil
Hewlett Packard Enterprise is another APM vendor you might consider. HPE is an innovator in the Gartner Magic Quadrant and that rating is based upon advanced user experience monitoring capability as well as a wide range of SLA management features – both critical for an MSP.
HPE AppPulse APM excels at User Experience Monitoring. Its capabilities extend beyond just identifying the user action that precedes a problem into mapping out the entire “User Flow”. This enables you to see all of the transaction steps that the user follows to initiate their transaction.
Since there are usually multiple flows that a user can choose from while starting from the same initial action, so that you’re able to determine if any of you user flow paths are more problematic than others. Listing the initiating user action alone, as most of the other products do, isn’t enough to show you which transactions the action has impacted and which are fine.
This creates a 3D view of user interaction versus the more 2D picture that pointing to the user action provided by competitive offerings creates.
Another very strong capability for MSPs that HPE APM provides is SLA management. HPE AppPulse Active provides a range of SLA alerts, notifications, and reports to enable you to continuously monitor SLA compliance for all of the app environments under management.
These SLA management capabilities along with scripting capability based on HPE LoadRunner TruClient and VuGen technologies and allows load test to be run against apps in production using the same protocols used in QA/Test.
HPE Mobile Center, which is part of HPE’s ADM software suite along with LoadRunner and StormRunner, enables you to capture test scripts directly from actual mobile devices and then use them for pre-production load testing as well as within AppPulse Active APM in production.
Overall, this provides the most comprehensive range of performance management and testing tools available to enable you to ensure optimum service for your customers. You can also offer them additional service capabilities to enable them to support “bring your own device”, web apps and enterprise app monitoring.
Most of the HPE APM products are offered as SaaS offerings to make them very affordable for your SMB customers to whom overall cost is critical. They also offer very intuitive point and click web interfaces, which makes them easy for Line of Business users to use.
Best of all, all HPE APM products are developed in Israel. Our team there would be glad to assist you in implementing your MSP programs. We also have numerous reference customers in Israel to whom you could speak to obtain their insights about HPE APM products. That can also enable rapid local support which might be critical for ensuring your business success.
Tom Fisher
HPE APM
tfisher@hpe.com