We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two AIOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very good APM tool. There is a lot of thorough scanning of services and applications. It has got great monitoring features."
"The user experience allows us to be able to gauge customer experience and understand the performance impact of our platform."
"Having OneAgent is the most valuable feature of Dyantrace, as well as the monitoring."
"We had point solutions where we could see different elements of the stack, and Dynatrace ties everything together. Before, we could never get that full-stack monitoring. It also helps us get us the context of the customer experience. What's the business impact of those problems?"
"Dynatrace AppMon has allowed a deep dive review of performance problems in near real-time for our primary external website and related web apps and web services."
"This tool has been essential for monitoring our systems, gathering all performance data, and helping to quickly resolve difficult problems affecting our customers ability to process their work through our systems."
"We enabled UEM for all of our applications. This allows us to see exactly what the client is experiencing."
"It gives us all the data on all the calls, which is something that is very different from any other APM solution that I have seen or used in the past."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."
"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."
"Power packs."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"Scalability has improved quite a bit from the beginning."
"The initial setup was relatively complex because we were trying to implement into environments that they did not yet support."
"While designing the business dashboard, I encountered various bugs that impacted my work."
"Bring the interface to the same level as OneAgent."
"When the tool ingests data from other tools, being able to correlate those with the existing topology, so that the AI engine can draw more conclusions in case Dynatrace does not monitor those instances."
"I would like better plugin support, because they are constantly asking us to do plugins, saying "Yeah, we can do that. Use this plugin." Then, the moment something goes wrong with that plugin, I have no way of getting help."
"It needs a dashboard for cluster events in general, and for Kubernetes specifically."
"The con of Dynatrace is that, at times, because it has so much information, it becomes difficult to see the root cause of your problem, and then you have to dig around to find the root cause."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"They need a little more self-service."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in AIOps with 340 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 5th in AIOps with 42 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog, ServiceNow Discovery and Zabbix. See our Dynatrace vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best AIOps vendors.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
