Compare Dynatrace vs. SiteScope

Dynatrace is ranked 1st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 259 reviews while SiteScope is ranked 20th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while SiteScope is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "I am confident in the tool's scalability because it easily deals with .NET Applets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteScope writes "The GUI is cumbersome, and it requires a Java client". Dynatrace is most compared with Splunk, AppDynamics and New Relic APM, whereas SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Splunk. See our Dynatrace vs. SiteScope report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dynatrace Logo
43,981 views|27,510 comparisons
SiteScope Logo
3,430 views|2,155 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace vs. SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
With the Agentless monitoring and ability to create custom plugins, we've been able to transform the tool not just into a great APM solution but a really good enterprise monitoring solution too.Dynatrace helped us with root cause analysis of poor performing components of our applications.The product allows us to build preferred/customized business transactions to track complex transactions. UEM (User Experience Monitoring) agents track user experience on webRequests. The advantage is that Dynatrace correlates the measures on the devices with those on the backend servers, giving us an end-to-end view of the transaction, from the user's phone deep into the backend servers.It has helped us improve the performance of many of our applications.With the latest version, the AI engine highlights the root causes automatically.The major improvement was the ability to find errors immediately and predict future failures, or when resources reach the maximum capacity.The most valuable feature is the ability to perform synthetic checks for monitoring sites using click paths.Dynatrace helped us to get a better understanding of how our services are communicating with each other, as well as better problem detection before something really breaks

Read more »

The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability.Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours.It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates.

Read more »

Cons
This solution could be improved with better compatibility with legacy applications.It would be nice if there were a way that it could be made simpler, given the complexity of the things that we're monitoring.This solution needs better support for security and monolithic batch processes.If the user interface were made more intuitive then it would really benefit the product.Sometimes it is hard to find the right setting for what you want to change.This solution needs improvement in terms of automation.We would like the AI to produce more scientific data with less configuration.The reporting is still too young and needs to be improved.

Read more »

They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our annual costs were about the same for both AppDynamics and Dynatrace.Pricing can be high, especially for Portuguese standards. But as one says, you get what you pay for.Setup cost is very low considering that it is an almost totally, automatic process.Licensing is very interesting, as you pay only for what is being monitored. A lot of things are given away for no additional cost. If you have a great IT consolidation, it will be pretty cheap. If you have a lot of servers, it will be heavier.I have not been able to observe more than 1% overhead, despite Dynatrace saying that it can be slightly higher in some situations.Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace is excellent.The pricing and licensing are very expensive.Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was a pretty straightforward process. We had no hiccups.

Read more »

You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles.SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
43,981
Comparisons
27,510
Reviews
259
Average Words per Review
501
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
3,430
Comparisons
2,155
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
373
Avg. Rating
6.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope
Learn
Dynatrace
Micro Focus
Overview

Dynatrace has redefined how you monitor today’s digital ecosystems. AI-powered, full stack and completely automated, it’s the only solution that provides answers, not just data, based on deep insight into every user, every transaction, across every application. More than 8,000 customers use Dynatrace to optimize customer experiences, innovate faster and modernize IT operations with absolute confidence.

SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.
Offer
Learn more about Dynatrace
Learn more about SiteScope
Sample Customers
Audi, Best Buy, LinkedIn, CISCO, Intuit, KRONOS, Scottrade, Wells Fargo, ULTA Beauty, Lenovo, Swarovsk, Nike, Whirlpool, American ExpressVodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company20%
Financial Services Firm18%
Insurance Company9%
Comms Service Provider7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise74%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise82%
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace vs. SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email