We performed a comparison between Avantra and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"You can customize alerts based on need."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"We are using Dynatrace for prediction and staging for every step of our development cycle."
"Great tool for deep diving into performance data and tracking issues through all the connected systems to better diagnose and pinpoint the real issues."
"It provides the whole perspective in a single place when trying to guide the right people to go to the right solution at any given point in time."
"Finds issues that previously occupied people for months."
"Since we moved to OneAgent, we are much quicker to address live incidents and problems that occur in our systems."
"The PurePath feature enables you to see the path from click to database query."
"We have substantially lowered incidents in our organization."
"Comprehensive suite of solutions that can address all aspects of applications from dev to ops."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"C language integration requires manual implementation through the SDK, which is rather difficult and time consuming."
"They should include more mission learning into the product and provide additional performance metrics for application learning."
"It is always requiring us to update the Dynatrace client."
"The business use case is that most people want to see how many orders came in. I'd like to be able to get data out of JavaScript tags, and capture more data. I think that would make it much more useful, rather than using Google Analytics. Instead, have one tool to capture all the stack, that would make it easy."
"In AppMon, the performance could be improved. That is the one thing I am most interested in."
"For AppMon, there is always room for improvement: charting, dashboarding, and user management."
"Dynatrace needs to improve its configuration."
"The user interface for the management functions is not particularly intuitive for even the most common features."
Avantra is ranked 38th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews. Avantra is rated 8.6, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". Avantra is most compared with Datadog, AppDynamics and OpsRamp, whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor. See our Avantra vs. Dynatrace report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.