Compare Eagle Technology Proteus vs. IFS Applications

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Eagle Technology Proteus vs. IFS Applications and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

More IFS Applications Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Some of the strengths are Enterprise Management Solutions and the series of Management solutions which is number one in Gartner's report and has been for the last five years.
Top Answer: It's not cheapest, and it's not mediocre pricing. Pricing is comparatively or sufficiently higher than maybe all other IT solutions. There are no additional fees, and everything is included in the… more »
Top Answer: There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP. It's a blockchain platform. We are currently exploring these types of features to enhance our solutions for added value… more »
Ranking
Views
57
Comparisons
44
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
5,237
Comparisons
3,612
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
649
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Proteus
Learn More
IFS
Video Not Available
Overview
Software to streamline data collection and consolidate into a single format for greater organization across the organization.

IFS develops and delivers enterprise software for customers around the world who manufacture and distribute goods, maintain assets, and manage service-focused operations. The industry expertise of our people and solutions, together with commitment to our customers, has made us a recognized leader and the most recommended supplier in our sector. Our team of 3,500 employees supports more than 10,000 customers worldwide from a network of local offices and through our growing ecosystem of partners. For more information, visit: IFSworld.com

Offer
Learn more about Eagle Technology Proteus
Learn more about IFS Applications
Sample Customers
Bellevue Club, Midway International Airport (MDW), Spokane International Airport, MI Windows & Doors, Larned State Hospital
Saab Aerospace, Teledyne Technologies, Gables Engineering, Chief Industries, Linamar, Valmont, Hecla Mining, CDF Corporation, Shawcor Ltd, Richardson International, Rowan Companies
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider23%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Eagle Technology Proteus vs. IFS Applications and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Eagle Technology Proteus is ranked 16th in Enterprise Asset Management while IFS Applications is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. Eagle Technology Proteus is rated 0.0, while IFS Applications is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IFS Applications writes "Realized benefits in reporting and overall communication after consolidating our sites". Eagle Technology Proteus is most compared with , whereas IFS Applications is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, IBM Maximo, Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Microsoft Dynamics AX.

See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.