WaveMaker vs eApps comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    eApps Logo
    views| comparisons
    0% willing to recommend
    WaveMaker Logo
    263 views|210 comparisons
    100% willing to recommend
    Featured Review
    Anonymous User
    Anonymous User
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    Views
    263
    Comparisons
    210
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pramati
    Learn More
    eApps
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    eApps provides the applications you need to run your site AND a high level of support from qualified people that really care. With eApps, you have access to tools and professional services to maximize the uptime, performance and security of you site or application, without having to pay the mega-host provider price tag.

    WaveMaker is a visual application development platform to build web and mobile applications at a fraction of the time and cost of traditional application development.

    Sample Customers
    panoguide, Resmark Systems, Abe's of Maine, Spice and Tea Exchange, Inc., Interface41, Agilis Software, Champions Again, Donohue Design, sportstracklive, Symbiotics, SaneBull
    Vanenburg, Flanagan

    eApps doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while WaveMaker is ranked 31st in Rapid Application Development Software. eApps is rated 0.0, while WaveMaker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of eApps writes "Great service and support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WaveMaker writes "This is a RAD tool to build business apps, tables, and forms". eApps is most compared with , whereas WaveMaker is most compared with Mendix and Microsoft Power Apps.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.